harvest u just came to fart on the topic my dear.
yes, basically a poseidon server (ok) with hidden packet alteration in server type (not ok).EternalHarvest wrote:The only decent official RO server I've seen wasn't free to play anyway, ironically.Brainpower wrote:to charge for the weekly client change fix. You have to pay monthly for the amount of bots you are using.
Completelly irrelevant.
DIY, nothing in GPL prevents you from showing that or even "contributing" all these modifications back to openkore.kLabMouse wrote:What I Demand. Is to follow that Rule, and Show modifications in bRO.pm to public!
If you are going to distribute you must keep it open
Scary! Are you the governing organization over .br zone or just a super hacker?kLabMouse wrote:Else, I will force openkore.br to be taken down, along will all the links there.
He was talking about taking down from here and remove the links to their forum since when u click bRO area you are redirect to their forum, duh
AFAIK VisualKore was from the same authors so they can do what they please (for example, relicense. Rewriting code where needed).Don Delavitto wrote:It is illegal as visual kore was
With the code they developed yes.
Barioth wrote:They weren't charging for an update, they were charging for a connection, something very common here. There are lots of Remote Poseidon sellers and no one complains about itSelling Poseidon-as-a-service is perfectly fine, even if they're using changed Poseidon, as it's not under something like AGPL.kLabMouse wrote:The Only Thing I companied, is that GPLv2 code should stay open.
As said before, by many including klab, yes selling poseidon is fine, which is not only the case.
It can be, if it's a Poseidon service and related configurations, for example.Don Delavitto wrote:I did not wanned to quote it here, but since you are so avid to make your point, it is funny that you are saying that you are not selling openkore, but in the chat a few minutes ago, you said "i can sell that fix anytime without breaking the GNU licese". Super.
Its not only a poseidon service.
I agree with this, if it's really something diverging from openkore. It doesn't look like that.Don Delavitto wrote:but at least change the name of the service
Thats all its spining around. Sell their services, change the name and the links from here, that would be just fine i believe.
Wait, service?Don Delavitto wrote:of the service
Yes service, not openkore, what they offer.
Not against rules of this place.5e13ct wrote:I wish the administrators here kore, take some action on administrators who are here and are the kore.br, even taking hands updates, do not offer, I think they should lose their jobs this forum because they do not follow the rules.
Sounds like a real problem, since there's no history and no way to inspect or revert changes.Don Delavitto wrote:Another point, will these users still be abble to commit to svn? I think they could continue as ordinary users of the openkore international comunity, but since some user could release a patch anytime that would break one of their sources of money, they could keep it away from being released since it could affect their bussiness.
Not a real problem but a headche. Which wont gonna happen as they wont sell anymore.
GhOsT_FoKer wrote:It's sad to see a project finish just because some mercenaries want money.Won't they try to keep it working if they really would make money from that? No, you rather choose no working openkore.Brainpower wrote:And do you guys think making some money of a GNU licensed software is better for the community?
Correct.
And rather choose they are not linked in here as the br area of support.
Discuss it here on openkore.com, wouldn't you? Why you always need to make some drama on obscure (to us) website and then go here with complaints?Fat4LitY wrote:doesn't want anyone discussing ways to the solution
Already being, before u posted it.
You know him in person, to be able to tell something like that?Fat4LitY wrote:he keeps with a huge lack of patience, insults everyone and ban people for any kind of reason, things he would NEVER make in his real life.
Yes, many users knows who he is in person
Service providers: go with it! Just make sure you're not violating GPL. You probably can contribute most of your changes back safely.
Complainants: nothing stops you from ignoring these sellers and developing your own stuff. Moderators of some non-openkore.com place can't stop you from posting here.
Correct, for that bRO forum shoud be unlinked. (im not against it being linked again, as it is right now, since they said they WONT sell anymore)
I don't know any details of who sells what. Can you provide an example of what you were about to get if you "buy" that?
Again
# Basically, this means that you're allowed to modify and distribute
# this software. However, if you distribute modified versions, you MUST
# also distribute the source code.
Wanna know the worst, klab worked with a certain someone to fix bro, instead of putting his findings to public, believing it would be released for the openkore comunity. Then after every weekly maintenace the fix was released often 3 4 days later, forcing the users to dig the solution without his help, while everyone knows the person who worked with him would not release it, but his web site which is bot-based was 100% functional right after the maintenance, as the same administrator of br forum said he was looking for a "colaboration". A lot of dirty clothes to wash huh. I can be placing them here all day long (i know a lot of histories which i prefered no putting here in the previous posts and which i prefer not going along with such, but i can if necessary), gotta a lot of histories to tell I acknowledge his work, but im showing a scenario which users wanna avoid in near future.
Thats why ppl rather now put the results klab or another dev in the name of openkore working for a comunity put his findings here, instead of one geting ahead and get the solution for himself releasing whenever him want$, and when ppl come here and click bRO server, which is linked directly to their forum from here (openkore.com), and when asked if theres a fix in their forum, they say, the dev has, his site is working, he will soon release after 3 or 4 days, leaving you to use openkore for 3 or 4 days a week, while he has all 7 days of the week, which solution was based on others devs work under his conditions also, as he mentioned above, thats why people now would like to get open support here, we even prefer that than being without the bot under such circusntances, instead of in the near future, be directed to their forum, then when ask for the fix of OPENkore (which now has hidden lines robbed from the work of others), they say its avalaible, but you have to pay for the software they are using not based solely on their work which consists only of hide the packets for bro pm and a poseidon server, for a work based on klab and other developers did which was meant to be used by the comunity, and also they dont wanna come here ask and get the answer, bro support is available at openkore.br. If they wanna be afiliated, they must play by the rules of this forum.
Understand now the point, we are not talking about a simple poseidon server, or software developed solely by their own, but a fix made with the help of someone else which they basically have the work to hide the packets of bro pm from their "customers", or do you want me to draw mr harvest.