Depreciating serverType

[Cozzie]

There are currently way too many serverType that is not used at all. Should it be depreciated and renumber them so people dont get confused easily?

[Bibian]

and what if gravity decides to re-use one of the ones we just deleted?

[sli]

He said depreciate, not remove. We could always provide legacy serverTypes (like, say, L_1, L_2, etc) that just don't come with OpenKore unless Gravity starts using that serverType again. Just a thought.

[Cozzie]

Yeah that's what I meant sli, also I remember somewhat there was a serverType chooser based on the master/version number, where is that.

[darkfate]

and what if gravity decides to re-use one of the ones we just deleted?

It's not like you actually can delete files from subversion without dumping, hacking and restoring a repository which we probably can't on sourceforge.. (and wouldn't make any sense either)

What I want to say is: What the hell do we have a Version Control System for? .. exactly for "problems" like this. Even if we delete them, you could still make a tag before doing that and if you forget to do it.. you can still search it in the history assuming you actually wrote commit log for it.

[isieo]

hm we could start giving them alias

serverType1 = alias default

and so on so forth