Search found 767 matches
- 18 Mar 2016, 06:30
- Forum: Developers Corner
- Topic: AI 2008 FLD2 & Pathfinding
- Replies: 40
- Views: 85931
Ultimate 5 years, 11 months and 13 days topic revive. Hi guys, i've been working on a new code for the openkore pathfinding for the past 3 weeks and today i finally completed it (or so do I think), it is written in C, even though i haven't implemented it in kore itself it has shown good work. Nice ...
See following sections in this pdf: http://www.valvesoftware.com/publications/2009/ai_systems_of_l4d_mike_booth.pdf "Moving through the Environment" -> looks like kore's current drunken walking. "Path Optimization" -> "Following path directly looks robotic" "Reactive Path Following" -> Looks like wh...
That looks like a sane thing to do.KeplerBR wrote:I asked for more people and then decided to change the command.
http://openkore.svn.sourceforge.net/vie ... w=revision
Ideally such commands should also ask the user for verification of intent.
Like so: "Do you really want to $action?" Y/N
Hi Guys, I understand Openkore already support instanced map. but is seem only support instanced name with additional 3digits name (ie: 0011@cata), while this kind of instance name is not supported: 0qs1@mist , 0oa1@mist , 0o71@mist PS: I have developer experience, but not perl :) Why not allow any...
No, No, No, this so very wrong and makes me sad: http://openkore.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openkore/tablepack/trunk/tables/servers.txt?r1=8161&r2=8160&pathrev=8161 pRO shouldn't use iRO or mRO, the right thing to do would be to create new pRO_servername servertypes instead. Next thing you know, peo...
For all tasks, post a patch here (or make a branch) so it can get tested and audited. Please, don't put any such disruptive changes in trunk, thank you! For new/aspiring developers, try to pick away at a Low Hanging Fruit task they are not less important, as most are the basis for harder tasks. LHF ...