Silence wrote:why are you even asking this...your complaining about 44k of ram being used...
OH LOL
Anyway, Kore is incredibly subjective to the conditions under which it's operating. My install will using anywhere from 10 megs up to 50 depending on where it is, what it's doing, etc. Basically that screen shot means nothing.
I think we should look at this objectively. It is true that openkore's resource usage nowadays is quite heavy and is very poorly optimized. What we should do is make a quantitative comparison of both source code.
Bear in mind however the different conditions, features, etc of each source code, it's not a straight apple to apple comparison.
with over 50.000 lines of code and i dont know how many variables to keep track off and all the modules, its not strange openkore uses a lot of memory.
Thaikore is only for tRO, whereas openkore is for almost every server. So we require a lot more modules and code to be loaded into memory.
I dont mind the 40 MB it takes, i got 8 GB ram (64 bit OS rocks)
sli wrote:Anyway, Kore is incredibly subjective to the conditions under which it's operating. My install will using anywhere from 10 megs up to 50 depending on where it is, what it's doing, etc. Basically that screen shot means nothing.
Bibian wrote:with over 50.000 lines of code and i dont know how many variables to keep track off and all the modules, its not strange openkore uses a lot of memory.
Thaikore is only for tRO, whereas openkore is for almost every server. So we require a lot more modules and code to be loaded into memory.
I dont mind the 40 MB it takes, i got 8 GB ram (64 bit OS rocks)
sli wrote:Anyway, Kore is incredibly subjective to the conditions under which it's operating. My install will using anywhere from 10 megs up to 50 depending on where it is, what it's doing, etc. Basically that screen shot means nothing.